The recent detention of Bangladesh Army officer Major Sadique has stirred significant controversy and concern across political and civil society circles, amid allegations of politically motivated targeting. His arrest and the subsequent investigations into his alleged involvement with the banned Awami League have led many to question the impartiality of the current interim government’s actions.
Major Sadique, who was taken into military custody from his Uttara residence on 17 July, reportedly comes from a family with historical ties to the Awami League — the former ruling party that was ousted and banned under controversial circumstances last year. The Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) Directorate confirmed that a court of inquiry has been formed to investigate allegations linking him to a gathering associated with the Awami League and its student wing, Chhatra League. A separate probe is also examining his alleged unauthorised absence from duty.
The investigation stems from a police raid on 8 July at a convention centre in Bashundhara, where 22 individuals — many affiliated with the Awami League — were arrested. Authorities claimed the gathering of 300–400 people featured anti-government slogans and plans to launch a public movement. A case under the Anti-Terrorism Act was filed at Bhatara Police Station, with investigators subsequently implicating Major Sadique.
In a press briefing, Brigadier General Md Nazim-Ud-Daula, Director of Military Operations, acknowledged the allegations and confirmed that disciplinary actions would follow if charges are substantiated. However, he cautioned against drawing conclusions before the inquiry is completed.
Despite the military’s assurance of neutrality, human rights advocates and political analysts have expressed skepticism over the timing and framing of the case. Some suggest the action may be part of a broader campaign by the interim government, led by Dr. Muhammad Yunus, to undermine or intimidate individuals perceived to be aligned with the banned Awami League.
Critics argue that such moves — particularly when based on unverified claims or before investigative findings are released — risk undermining due process and the credibility of state institutions. “The narrative around this case feels more like a political signal than a legal one,” said a Dhaka-based political commentator.
Several rights organisations have called for a transparent and impartial investigation, warning against using legal and military mechanisms to serve political ends. They also raised concern that the case could be a diversionary tactic to shift public focus from the interim government’s growing administrative challenges, economic instability, and the shrinking democratic space in the country.
As tensions continue to simmer, the case of Major Sadique has become emblematic of the broader concerns surrounding the rule of law, political freedom, and institutional independence in Bangladesh under the current regime.